“if it was suspended and terminated correctly, then i don’t think thee is a way back”
Now – there is the question! Why was the review undertaken? Was there any reasonable doubt about entitlement? DAR 13 prescribes the circumstances under which the suspension (leading to termination) should be made. A random review requirement is not really covered. (What “question has arisen”?) Did anyone try calling the claimant before ending the HB?
There is also the wording of any notification letters. If it used the term “cancellation”, for example, it has not been done correctly.
In short, I am sure you can justify revising under some (possibly very minor) error in the suspension/termination process.
