short answer is yes, apply u/ent – the regs read that had the full facts ofclmt and partner been known they are applied -0 in this case its Ok to notionally “swap”clmt and partner roles toaward the U/ent… theys a couple of posts on here ( i asked the same question a while ago as couldnt get my head around how someonew who insnt eligible to makea NEW CLAIM claim could be treated a such for Underlying entiotlement……. somevery detailed , technical replies explaining why it was ok….
