Reply To: Underlying entitlement where claimant has permanently moved away

#284866
John Smith
Participant

Hi John, can you point me a a reg that says that? I don’t recall the HB regs distinguishing between married or unmarried partners? If claimant going to be away for more than 52 weeks, then he cannot part of the household, so while they may still consider themselves partners, they surely cannot be partners for HB purposes?