Reply To: CH/4234/2004

#9179
aosulliv
Participant

The decision regarding recovery was made in August 2003, so fell under the old reg 101.

Mark,

I think I may have confused you on reissuing payment. What I should have said was reverse post the overpayment therefore recrediting the money that has been paid by the Landlord to clear the overpayment and then recovering the debt from ongoing entitlement.

One more point, the Landlord asked for a SoR in Aug 03 and a response to this was issued. The Solicitors are trying to state that the claimant should have also been given a copy of this letter. I don’t think they have grounds for an argument on that one though.