Reply To: Exempt accomodation


I was going to make the point (before reading Kevin’s post) that I was not sure why a Tribunal heard the appeal as they did. It seems to me that the Tribunal is no longer considering the LA’s initial decision (which it appears that the LL now accepts was correct) but is being asked to make a new decision on evidence that was not before the decision-maker or possibly did not even exist at the time.

My view is that the Tribunal should have rejected the appeal (because the appellant has accepted that the LA made the right decision based on the info it had at that date) and the LL should then have asked the LA to revise its decision on the new evidence.