Reply To: Multiple reg 9 issues & capital

#162461
nick dearnley
Participant

I don't see how she can win the appeal against the decision on the Feb 17 claim; as a fact she was a long lease holder at that point. 

For the most recent claim. she's no longer a long lease holder so that can't bar her.  You're right that as a former long leaseholder she is barred unless she can prove she had to give it up.  I doubt very much that there is any agreement between her and her son about him loaing her £30k to clear her DLA debt and it being secured against the lease.  I'm not sure how she could meet the exception to 9(1)(ha).

I also think there is a deprivation argument to be made in the alternative.  It seems she has given up the lease (worth £98k) to repay her son for paying off her debt (£30k), so losing out on the balance if she had sold the lease on the open market.  If he has paid her for it then surely she will have excess capital?