One other option is to proceed to Tribunal, acknowledging the deficiencies in the notif, but setting all the info out clearly in the submissions and, in turn, arguing that the content of the letters didn’t harm / prejudice the clmt’s case because s/he was still able to appeal and is now fully aware of all of the facts in any case (citing [b:a43459db1b][i:a43459db1b]Awaritefe[/i:a43459db1b][/b:a43459db1b] in support of this argument).
I have, on occasion, taken the “[i:a43459db1b]Awaritefe[/i:a43459db1b]” approach and, to date, no (serious) objection has been raised.
