A very old contrivance

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #22615
    petedavies
    Participant

    Does anyone know if any changes were made to thge old Reg. 7 between 1989 and 25/01/99?

    Many thanks!

    #8869
    Anonymous
    Guest

    There were a few – if you have a copy of the CPAG book, it lists all amendments to regs just before the commentary starts.

    #8870
    petedavies
    Participant

    The commentary only deals with the Regs as they stand – if there has been an amendment to an amendment or an amendment to an amendment to an amendment it only details the most recent change. Not that the Regs change that much of course….!

    I have CPAG going back to 1999-2000, the rest I threw about a year ago never dreaming I would need them again!

    #8871
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Try A1/99. That details the latest changes – I think ❓

    #8872
    Anonymous
    Guest

    As far as I recall, nothing of any substance changed in Reg 7(1) until the major shake-up in 99…so would not the other references in CPAG still be relevant?

    #8873
    markp
    Participant

    Pete,

    As promised, have ferretted (is there such a verb?) through the old Findlay’s I have (back to 1996 only now I come to look but this seems to have remained unchanged until 25.1.99 when the new Reg 7 (old Regs) took effect.

    Do you need anything from the (ancient) Findlay’s because I could copy the analysis which will give you caselaw and send them to you.

    Let me know.

    Mark

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.