The only possible issue concerns the submission: if the impartial bits (sections 1 to 6) are prepared by someone who has a personal stake in the decision under appeal, there is a slight risk that the chronology of facts and selection of documents to attach might not be truly impartial. There might be a subconscious tendency for the decision maker to present their version of events as historical fact whereas the facts might be disputed. Of course, the Tribunal is supposed to probe into the facts, but there is a slight risk here that the whole process is subtly biased in the Council’s favour.
I think you need to be extra careful that you put together sections 1 to 6 with your “friend of the court” hat firmly on your head. I would even sugest that you actually do wear a real hat, just to remind you.
.
