CD on its way to you.
Seems to me that the L/L is being selective in his reading of [b:fc78c0bd05]HBR 95[/b:fc78c0bd05].
The L/L’s argument appears to be based on [b:fc78c0bd05]para 3[/b:fc78c0bd05], which states:
[quote:fc78c0bd05](3) Where the relevant authority is not satisfied that the landlord is a fit and proper person to be the recipient of a payment of rent allowance no such payment shall be made direct to him under paragraph (1). [/quote:fc78c0bd05]
HOWEVER, para 1b makes it equally clear that payment does not have to be made to the L/L [quote:fc78c0bd05]where it is in the overriding interest of the claimant not to make direct payments to the landlord.[/quote:fc78c0bd05]
One other piece of caselaw that *may* be of help (haven’t checked for direct relevance) is:
[b:fc78c0bd05]R v Liverpool CC ex p ARBOINE (1997) EWHC Admin 1073 QBD[/b:fc78c0bd05]
related to::
[b:fc78c0bd05]R v Liverpool CC ex p ARBOINE (1998) EWCA 1565[/b:fc78c0bd05]
Arboine is available on http://www.bailii.org