Can I have some opinions on this please –
we have some cases where the claimant has been on IS but this has been terminated for some periods due to undisclosed earnings. Our fraud department have given us the wage information so that HB/CTB overpayments can be calculated.
In ‘normal’ circumstances when someone comes off IS we would request proof of income and capital, and if it wasn’t provided, suspend and then terminate the claim. In these cases, as we held them as passported we have never received capital information.
My question is, should we be obtaining evidence of capital for the periods where no IS was payable and we are having to recalculate HB/CTB entitlement? Or should we just recalculate using the earnings? I think we should get the account details as the chances are the claimant has accumalated some capital by claiming benefits and working, but the fraud team don’t seem keen on trying to get this info. If they can’t get it I am tempted to adverse inference that the capital is high enough to nil qualify them for benefit. However, if the DWP have not terminated IS due to capital, should be bother going to the trouble of trying to get it?
What do other authorities do? Only obtain evidence of the undisclosed income/capital, or insist on evidence of everything?
thanks