Payment on account for PFA

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #45751
    Tonynug
    Participant

    A CAB is requesting that we make a "payment on account" for a Polish PFA that has been refused  HB due to having no right to reside. CAB states a "very similar" case is currently being considered by the "European Court of Justice" and are awaiting a verdict. 

    My claimant in UK since 2009, working then lost job, iro JSAIB for a few months Jan12 to May12, got pregnant, applied for IS but was refused as a PFA. Clmt was awarded State Maternity Allowance instead. We have said no right to reside as no "worker" status.

    Surely a payment on account is not for such cases ? Views please 

    #128761
    trismegistus
    Participant

    Hi there,

    I’m not sure about a payment on account, but I’m guessing the CAB are arguing that as EU law is directly applicable in the UK, and that one of the principles of EU law is discrimination then you should be applying the principles of the St Prix case directly before the ECJ ruling is made on the referal late last year from the Supreme Court.

    It’s a difficult area, the arguement in favour is that a EEA national male who comes to the UK to work can have a baby and stay in work, as his non-EEA national wife will retain worker status even if she gives up work to look after the baby, so long as the EEA husband is working; whereas an EEA national female who comes to the UK and has a baby with her non-EEA national husband will be in a precarious position if she loses worker status if she wants to stay at home and look after her baby – this appears to be unequal treatment between men and women.

    I suspect that the best thing to do here is to stay the decision pending the CJE decision and/or refer the client to social services for an assessment under the Children Act 1989 – it is at least concievable that as a child in need, her child may be entitled to financial support to help keep a roof over his/her head – but getting money from social services is easier said than done!

    #128762
    Tonynug
    Participant

    Thanks Stephen,
    The CAB have quoted the St Prix case and I believe the CAB are asking that we should pay the HB on an “interim” basis pending the outcome of the St Prix case. However, my view is that we have made the correct decision based on the regs and until such “law” comes into place the decision remains the same and we should not pay HB incase the law chnages. Cheers!

    #128764
    trismegistus
    Participant

    Only other thing to check is whether the client has a husband or civil partner – if so is s/he an EEA national in the UK exercising a treaty right? Then you may be able to treat her as liable on other grounds as there is no need to be living with the spouse/civil partner to have rights as their family member.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.