Self Employed Assessment Period over 1 year

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #31754
    Alex G
    Participant

    Hi,

    I have, errrrrrrrr… a friend in a LA who has a claim.., that is based on Self Employed Earnings.

    The SEE was calculated in 2007.

    The claim has not been reviewed until now.

    Reg 30 indicates that the assessment period [i:e2a80bf49a]should [/i:e2a80bf49a]not be more than a year. But what happens now?

    Should the SEE be reviewed from 2008 – one year on from 2007? Or do I make a supercession from the current date ?

    Any advice or thoughts would be welcomed,

    #88823
    andyrichards
    Participant

    What has actually caused it to be “reviewed” now?

    #88824
    Kevin D
    Participant

    As for the method of calculation earnings, it could be that more than one “assessment period” must be considered – it can be shorter than one year (this assumes it’s a working-age claim). So, if your LA is looking to look at awards for a period going back more than one year, evidence of earnings will need to be in blocks not exceeding one year.

    If, within any assessment period, there is an identifiable change of circs, that takes effect from the Monday following the change in accordance with HBR 79(7). There is no legal basis on which SEE changes are treated differently from the majority of other income changes (relevant benefits being an obvious exception).

    #41740
    Alex G
    Participant

    There was a hbms scan for unchanged tax credits that had also been running since , dare I say it, 2007.

    😳

    #41741
    Anonymous
    Guest

    There is no requirement to review (ie recalculate) self-employed earnings every year. The assessment period relates to the period over which the earnings are calculated, say a particular tax year. You only [u:0ee2390daa]need[/u:0ee2390daa] to reassess s/e earnings if there has been a change in circumstances, although in practice most authorities would review such earnings more regularly.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.