Hobby horse time….
It is perfectly true that some LAs have in fact “accepted” such arguments by L/Ls. However, many of those LAs haven’t bothered to make proper enquiries and have simply capitulated.
It is plain that Sheffield (with Rivendell Lake) and another LA (with Renaissance) did in fact make such enquiries. At least one other LA has also done so, but although decided by Tribunal in favour of the LA, any further comment is potentially prejudicial because it isn’t yet clear whether an appeal will be made to Commissioners.
There are a significant number of non-RSL L/Ls who have claimed that CSS is being provided on their behalf when this is patently not the case. The CSS argument is being used by those L/Ls purely as a means of trying to bring the claims within the exempt accom rules and, therefore, obtain rents (by way of HB) that could not possibly be obtained any other way. And, based on evidence I have personally seen, it is quite possible to conclude that this is a deliberate tactic by such L/Ls.
So, refer away……