Workers Registration Scheme.

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #22382
    Stalbansbenefits
    Participant

    Polish National, working full time, claims HB.

    We ask her for evidence that she is registered for work. She replies she was not aware she needed to be, but applies immediately and a month later receives confirmation from the home office that she is registered.

    Question is, can we pay for the first month of the claim (ie, before she was actually registered). Gut reaction is no. However, it seems that you can’t register until you find a job, and then this process normally takes a month anyway. So if a claimant had applied for HB/CTB as soon as she entered the country and started a new job, it is likely they wouldn’t receive notification of their registration until a month had elapsed through no fault of their own. Seems a bit harsh we wouldn’t pay for this month…

    #7814
    Carol Meredith
    Participant

    They are not actually supposed to work until they get the registration documents. I have seen cases where the employer has held the job until the registration came through. I do not think that yiu can pay until she was correctly registered.

    #7815
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Reg 7(2)(b) and (3) of the Accession (Immigration and Worker Registration) Regulations 2004 says that the worker must apply for registration within a month of starting work: as long as they satisfy that condition, the work is authorised from day 1. They can start work immediately and they are legit during the one-month period allowed for an application to be made, while the application is being processed, and then of course after they receive the certificate. So the second group that St A mentions can be paid as workers fom Day 1.

    But they way I read the 2004 Regs, if you miss that one-month time limit you cannot be treated as a worker during any lead-in period while your application is processed: you will not become a worker until you are actually issued with a certificate, at which point Reg 7(2)(c) will apply. I think this is the situation that applies to the specific case that St A raises.

    Extract from Reg 7 (as originally made; a lot of the 2004 Regs has been amended to kingdom some since then, but fingers crossed this one is still correct):

    [color=darkblue:bbf40ade7c](2) An employer is an authorised employer in relation to a worker if –

    (b) the worker –
    (i) during the one month period beginning on the date on which he begins working for the employer, applies for a registration certificate authorising him to work for that employer in accordance with regulation 8; and
    (ii) has not received a valid registration certificate or notice of refusal under regulation 8 in relation to that application or ceased working for that employer since the application was made;

    [or]

    (c) the worker has received a valid registration certificate authorising him to work for that employer and that certificate has not expired under paragraph (5) …

    (3) Where a worker begins working for an employer on or after 1st May 2004 that employer is an authorised employer in relation to that worker during the one month period beginning on the date on which the work begins.[/color:bbf40ade7c]

    #7816
    David
    Participant

    I agree with Carol because for claimant to meet definition of an A8 worker entitled to benefit he’ll need Worker Registration Card and Certificate. Without this, he’ll have a right to reside for 3 months but will be expected to be self sufficient

    #7817
    Stalbansbenefits
    Participant

    Thanks Peter. That makes perfect sense.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.